2016 (10) TMI 639

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ates for the interested party ORDER Per B. Ravichandran: The appellant is the exporter of Hot Rolled Flat Products of Stainless steel (the subject goods) from Malaysia. Aggrieved by the Final Findings dated 9.3.2015 of the Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties, Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Customs Notification No. 28/2015-Cus ADD dated 5.6.2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance, the present appeal is filed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd. (Indian producer) approached the Designated Authority (DA) for initiating investigation on import of subject goods for imposition of anti-dumping duty. The DA initiated the investigation on 11.3.2014. After following the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndings and submitted that the appellant's claim regarding import from Malaysia being de-minimis is factually not correct. The import data for the POI has been correctly taken which is above de-minimis. 6. The Id. A.R. for the Revenue supported the findings of the Designated Authority and also AD levy by Customs Notification. 7. We have heard all the sides and examined the appeal records including written submissions. The appellant is also contesting levy of anti-dumping duty on imports from Malaysia. The main ground is that the exports from Malaysia to India too low. We find that in terms of Rule 14 (d) of, the DA shall terminate the investigation if the value of import from particular country accounts for less than 3% of the total im....