2016 (10) TMI 469
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Designated Authority (the DA), Directorate General of Anti-Dumping & Allied Duties, Ministry of Commerce and Industry conducted investigation into the import of subject goods which resulted in imposition of provisional AD duty vide Customs Notification dated 15.06.2009. Definitive AD duty was imposed vide Customs Notification dated 12.04.2010. Subsequent to Tribunal's order dated 11.08.2011 a post decisional hearing was given by the DA and findings were issued on 10.04.2012. M/S Bharat Forge Limited (DI) approached the DA for continuation and enhancement of AD duty on subject goods. The sunset review was initiated on 13.06.2013 and Final Findings was notified on 11.09.2015. In between the validity of AD duty was extended upto 12.09.2015....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onclude the likelihood of recurrence of injury due to dumped import of subject goods by the appellant. 3. Ld. Counsel for the DI submitted that the finding has recorded the continued dumping of the subject goods (0-10%). Though, the total volume of import from subject country was low during the sunset review, it was noted that the current injury margin may not provide a clear indication of the future level of injurious import. This is because the dumping margin estimated are significantly positive though volumes are low. Ld. Counsel also submitted that apart from domestic market, India is the only market for export of subject goods by the appellant. The export to third countries are miniscule. Post POI data has also been analysed t....


TaxTMI