2016 (10) TMI 438

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar   For the Respondent : Mr. Manokaran Sundaram, A.G.P., O R D E R Heard Mr. P.V.Sudakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Manokaran Sundaram, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act, 2006) has ch....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....refund order. The said writ petition was disposed of, by directing the respondent to consider the representation, dated 24.12.2015. However, that order has not been complied with by the first respondent therein, but he chose to issue a notice, dated 26.04.2016, based on certain queries raised by the Deputy Commissioner (CT). This notice is impugned in this writ petition. It is not known under whic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dditional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondent, on instructions, submitted that, such a procedure is being followed by the authorities while effecting refund. 6. Even assuming that there is some manual of procedures formulated by the Commercial Taxes Department, which obviously has no statutory force, it has to be seen as to what would be the effect of the order, if to be pas....