2016 (10) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Piyush Kumar with Mr. Jitendra Singh, Advocate for the Petitoner. Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate for the Respondent. ORDER In both these proceedings, the petitioners complain that their premises i.e. C-44, Vijay Vihar, Phase-I, Rohini, New Delhi and G-22, Vijay Vihar, Phase-I, Rohini, New Delhi are under continued occupation by the Commissioner of Central Excise ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oods, subject to payment of Rs. 75 lacs as redemption fine. 3. It is not disputed that the petitioners did not deposit the redemption fine amount. As a consequence, the goods have been vested with the respondent- Commissioner of Central Excise and the order-in-original having been made on 30.11.2015, the respondent should have ensured that the premises i.e. two immovable properties were restore....