2016 (10) TMI 211
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mani Annamalai ORDER Heard Mr.S.Raveekumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, the learned Additional Government Pleader, for the respondent and with the consent of either side, the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act) and an asse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... reported the sales, which were effected to them, in their Annexure-II statement. Thirdly it is stated that there is difference in the purchase turnover shown in the balance-sheet and the purchase turnover shown in the returns. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the date when the petitioner effected transactions, the vendors of the petitioner were all active dealers.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of transaction. Apart from that, the petitioner can seek for details with regard to cross verification of the buyers and sellers as per Annexure-I and such details can be furnished by the assessing officer and after which, the petitioner can be allowed to submit further objections and assessments can be re-done. 7. In the light of the above, the writ petitions are allowed, the impugned orders ....
TaxTMI