2016 (10) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondents. ORDER P.C. Heard Mr. Jetly, appearing for the appellant. He states that similar appeals have been admitted by a Division Bench of this Court {Customs Appeal No.9 of 2014 (The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai Vs. J.M. Baxi & Co. & Another) with connected appeals)} on 922015. This appeal is also admitted on the following substantial questions of law: (A) W....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the CESTAT has committed a substantial error of law in not referring to various documents produced by the Revenue before allowing the Appeal of the Respondents? (D) Whether the CESTAT is right in law in ignoring various documents which establish that the Respondents had evaded duty on the vessel imported by them for which no IGM/Bill of Entry was filed at the time of its importation? ....