Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (8) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lie in a short compass are stated thereunder. By notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (in short 'the Act') was published in the State Gazette on November 21, 1963 to acquire 5 acres-589-1/3 sq. yards in T.S. No. 981, Block No. 34 of Waitair Ward, Vishakapatnam for a housing scheme. The Collector awarded at Rs. 1.58 per sq. yard and on reference, the Civil Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 10 per sq. yard with solatium at 15 per cent and interest at 4 per cent. The respondent claimed @ Rs. 12 per sq. yard. On appeal and cross appeals the High Court confirmed the award and dis- missed the appeal as well as cross objections for enhancement to Rs. 12 per sq. yard. Two contentions have been raised by Shri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. The word "market value" would postulate price of the land prevailing on the date of the publication of the notification under section 4(1). This Court repeatedly laid the acid test that in determining the market value of the land, the price which a willing vendor might reasonably expect to obtain from a willing purchaser would form the basis to fix the market value. For ascertaining the market rate, the Court can rely upon such transactions which would offer a reasonable basis to fix the price. The price paid in sale or purchase of the land acquired within a reasonable time from the date of the acquisition of the land in question would be the best piece of evidence. In its absence the price paid for a land pos- sessing similar advantages....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... area. It is undoubted that in respect of a notification of 1961 in which another T.S. number in the locality, namely, T.S. No. 1008, ultimately, the High Court awarded @ Rs. 10 per sq. yard. Perhaps had there been no bona fide or genuine sale transaction relating to the self- same land, the reliance placed on that judgment may be justified but exclusion of bona fide and genuine sale trans- actions in respect of the same land under acquisition and to place reliance on the award of some other land is obviously illegal. When the claimants themselves sold as a willing seller of an acre of land @ Rs. 5 per sq. yard large extent of five acres and odd under acquisition, if it is offered to be sold as a block, it would not fetch higher rate but su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., dated July 17, 1990 wherein this Court had upheld the deduction of 1/5 from the market value towards developmental charges. It is settled law that the High Court and the Reference court when made wrong application of a principle or important points effecting valuation has been over looked or misapplied, this Court would under Art. 136 correct the same, vide The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore v.T. Adinarayan Setty, [1959] Suppl. 1 S.C.R. 404; Dattatrayaya Shankarbhat Ambalgi and Ors. v. The Collector of Sholapur and Anr., AiR 1970 SC 850-'[1971] 3 S.C.C. 431; The Dollar Co., Madras v. Collector of Madras, [1975] Supp. SCC 403 and Padma Uppal Etc. v. State of Punjab & Ors., [1977] 1 SCR 329. In Tribeni Devi & Ors. v. Collector....