Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (1) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct that incurrence of some expenses was statutorily required for maintaining a company. Thus, the addition so made should be deleted. (ii) Without prejudice to above ground no. 1, the ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in not restricting the disallowance u/s 14A to the extent of ₹ 2,00,849/- being the total expenses claimed by the assessee for the year ignoring the fact that disallowance u/s 14A for expenses relating to exempt income cannot exceed the total expenses claimed by the assessee in any manner. Thus, the disallowance should be restricted to ₹ 2,00,849/- and the addition in excess to the said amount should be deleted. (iii) Without prejudice to above ground no. 1 and 2, the ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... expenses to only those expenses which have been incurred in earning the tax-free income. The ld. CIT(Appeals) considered the facts of the case and submissions made before him. He came to the conclusion that the provisions contained in Rule 8D are applicable to this year (assessment year 2008-09), as held by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, (2010) 194 Taxman 203. Therefore, the AO had no option but to work out the disallowance in accordance with the aforesaid provisions. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee has been dismissed. 3. Before us, it is submitted that the assessee earned dividend income of ₹ 3,848/- only on investments in shares of about ₹ 5.20 crore. It w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in this behalf, he shall determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to earning such income. From the plain statutory language it follows that the assessing officer has to consider the claim of the assessee with reference to the accounts and the method prescribed for determining the disallowance has to be followed only if he is not satisfied with the claim made by the assessee. This procedure also applies in a case where it is claimed that no expenditure has been incurred, as provided in sub-section (3). It will be clear from the aforesaid that the assessing officer has to first examine the claim made by the assessee with reference to books....