Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 1412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ER PER K. D. RANJAN, AM: 1. This appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2005-06 arises out of the order of Ld. CIT(A) XIII, New Delhi. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are reproduced as under: "1) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing the expenses amounting to ` 22.65 lacs proportionately out of administrativ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. On appeal before Ld. CIT(A) it was submitted by the assessee that assessee had not incurred any expenditure for earning the tax free income. The tax free interest of ` 42,01,154/- was earned on ` 7.18 crores worth of REC and UTI bonds which had been purchased in the previous year. During the year, no financial expenses were made. No person was deputed specifically for earning the tax free inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld that provisions of Section 14A were not retrospective in nature. Ld. CIT(A) in view of the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the decision of ITAT in assessee's own case for Assessment Year 2004-05 held that disallowance u/s 14A should be estimated at ` 1 lacs which had been already suo moto disallowed by the assessee in its return of income. Therefore, no further disallowance was wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee for depreciation on computer @ 60%. He treated the computers and peripherals as plant & machinery and allowed depreciation @ 25%. On appeal, Ld. CIT(A) relying on the decision of ITAT in the case of ITO Vs Simran Majumdar 101 TTJ 501 and in the case of Expedators International (P) Ltd., Vs Addl. CIT 118 TTJ 2008 (Del.) held that output devices such as printer, scanner, server and por....