Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 1113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- and penalty of equal amount of Rs. 1,12,432/- was also  maintained.     2.   The fact of the case is that  the appellant received back some duty paid goods cleared on their own invoices due to defect/rejection.  The goods were  brought in the factory, the appellant  had taken Cenvat credit  on the returned goods for reprocessing during 14/7/2001 to  31/3/2005 on the strength of  their own invoices.  The show cause notice was issued with an allegation that  appellant is not entitle for  Cenvat credit  on their own invoices and they have not  followed the procedure  laid down  under Rule 173H of CER, 1944 read with Rule 16  of CER, 2002....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ments  are available  and no procedure  was followed.  As per Rule 16, no procedure  is prescribed  for taking  the duty paid  returned  goods, probably adjudicating authority  going on the erstwhile 173H contended   that the procedure should have been followed, whereas  173 H has no applicability  in the present case.  Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) has gone beyond the scope of show cause notice and adjudication order for disallowing the part amount of  Cenvat credit.  The  allegation  and even finding of  the adjudicating authority is only to the extent  duty paying  documents and compliance  with the procedure.  There was no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reof are brought to any factory for being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason, the assessee shall state the particulars of such receipt in his records and shall be entitled to take CENVAT credit of the duty paid as if such goods are received as inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and utilise this credit according to the said rules. (2)   If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received under sub-rule (1) at the rate applicable on the date of removal and on the value determined under sub-secti....