Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 980

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e For Revenue : Shri S K Shukla, Authorised Representative ORDER This appeal is filed against OIA No. KKS/383/DAMAN/2008 dt 30.9.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). 2.  The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Medicaments falling under the CH 30 of CETA 1985 on loan license basis. The appellant incurred certain ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red by their principal manufacturers i.e. the loan licensors. Therefore, the expenditures incurred towards obtaining FDA approval etc., on behalf of their loan licensors are irrelevant  as duty was paid on the transactions value of their loan licensors. He has  further submitted that  even though  this  point  was specifically  raised in their reply to the show c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e principal manufacturer, that is the Loan Licensors,  raising debit notes   for expenditures  incurred  on behalf of their Loan Licensors becomes irrelevant, however, the Appellant could not place sufficient evidences to  substantiate the said claim. We also find that this issue has not been properly raised  by the appellant before the Ld Commissioner (Appeals) ....