2016 (8) TMI 980
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e For Revenue : Shri S K Shukla, Authorised Representative ORDER This appeal is filed against OIA No. KKS/383/DAMAN/2008 dt 30.9.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Medicaments falling under the CH 30 of CETA 1985 on loan license basis. The appellant incurred certain ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....red by their principal manufacturers i.e. the loan licensors. Therefore, the expenditures incurred towards obtaining FDA approval etc., on behalf of their loan licensors are irrelevant as duty was paid on the transactions value of their loan licensors. He has further submitted that even though this point was specifically raised in their reply to the show c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e principal manufacturer, that is the Loan Licensors, raising debit notes for expenditures incurred on behalf of their Loan Licensors becomes irrelevant, however, the Appellant could not place sufficient evidences to substantiate the said claim. We also find that this issue has not been properly raised by the appellant before the Ld Commissioner (Appeals) ....
TaxTMI