1990 (12) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pt., 1988 rejected the application moved by the assessee under s. 256 (1) of the IT Act, the asessee prayed that the following questions may be framed and the matter may be referred to the High Court for determination on the points of law : 1. Whether the learned Tribunal was right in law in holding that a sum of ₹ 2,35,491.17 being expenses for levelling and adjustment of iron ore incurre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rani railway siding in terms of agreement dated 18th Sept., 1981 between Orissa Minerals Development Company Ltd. (Now a Government Undertaking) and the assessee firm? 4. Whether, the order of the learned Tribunal is not perverse and is not vitiated for arriving at wrong findings? 5. Whether, the learned Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee firm is entitled to deduction under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....provisions of s. 35E of the IT Act, according to the petitioner, s. 37 of the Act applies. 5. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is performing the job of excavating, sizing, sorting of ore. Thus, the petitioner assessee purchases iron ore and transports the same at the railway side. Sec. 35E (1) of the IT Act provides that the person who is engaged in any operation relating to prospecting, ....