Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (3) TMI 537

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ising out of order of CIT(A)-XX, Kolkata in Appeal No.381/CIT(A)-XX/Ward-34(4)/08-09/Kol dated 31.08.2010. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-34(4), Kolkata u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for Assessment Year 2007-08 vide his order dated 30.12.2009. 2. At the outset, it seems that this appeal by revenue is delayed by three days and there is a condona....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... examination of the entries in the bank a/c, there was no cash withdrawals found which could subsequently be taken as the source of the cash deposits in the bank account. So, the cash and cheque deposits were all of different entities and not interlinked." 4. We have heard rival submissions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. We find that the Assessing Officer made addition on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... at Rs. 1,80,247/-. We further find that the money deposited in the bank account was withdrawn either on the same day or on subsequent dates. It is seen that the total addition of the aggregate deposits in the bank account after giving benefit of withdrawals is the peak amount and in that case peak amount is to be added. We find that the assessee has maintained a bank account which is admittedly n....