Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 736

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eal with the ground of appellant against the action as well as order passed u/s 154 of the Act by the Assessing Officer The action u/s 154 had been wrongly resorted by the assessing officer the issue involved being highly debatable rendering the order passed there under unsustainable the confirmation of the said order by the learned CIT(A) is improper and unjust. (4) That the learned CIT(A) has also erred in dismissing the appellant's appeal by wrongly applying the decision of the Honourable Special Bench of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of DCTI vs Time Guarantee Ltd the facts of the said case being different besides the said case had not arisen out of an order u/s 154 but out of an order /s 143(3) the application of the ratio of the said case to that the appellant's is untenable and improper". 2. Brief facts qua the issue involved are that, assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacture of rolled products of Iron and steel. It had filed its return of income at "nil" on 01.10.2010 and as against the said returned income, assessment was completed under section 143(3) vide order dated 01.03.2013, determining the total income at Rs. 29,40,465/-. Later on, the Ld. Ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rat High Court in the case of General Motors India Ltd vs DCIT, reported in 354 ITR 244. 5. On the other hand, Ld. DR strongly relied upon the order of the CIT(A). 6. After considering the relevant finding given in the impugned orders as well as the submissions made by the parties, we find that the Ld. Authorities below, while decided the impugned issue have merely relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Special Bench in the case of DCTI vs Times Guarantee Ltd. (supra). It is an undisputed fact that the claim of carried forward of depreciation aggregating to Rs. 1,31,03,362/- pertains to assessment years 1998-99, 2000-01 and 2001-02. Before the amendment, the time limit for carried forward of unabsorbed depreciation was for period not more than 8 assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment years for which the aforesaid allowance was first computed. However, by the Finance Act, 2001 an amendment was brought under section 32(2), whereby, restriction of 8 years for the carried forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation was removed. This precise issue has been answered by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of General Motors India Pvt Ltd vs DCIT (supra) after detailed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l effect cannot be given to any allowance under clause (ii) of sub-section (1) in any previous year owning to there being no profits or gains chargeable for that previous year or owing to the profits or gains being less than the allowance, then, the allowance or the part of allowance to which effect has not been given (hereinafter referred to as unabsorbed depreciation allowance), as the case may be,- (i) shall be set off against the profits and gains, if any, of any business or profession carried on by him and assessable for that assessment year; (ii) if the unabsorbed depreciation allowance cannot be wholly set off under clause (i), the amount not so set off shall be set off from the income under any other head, if any, assessable for that assessment year; (iii) if the unabsorbed depreciation allowance cannot be wholly set off under clause (i) and Clause (ii), the amount of allowance not so set off shall be carried forward to the following assessment year and- (a) it shall be set off against the profits and gains, if any, of any business or profession carried on by him and assessable for that assessment year; (b) if the unabsorbed depreciation allowance cannot be whol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reads as under :- "Modification of provisions relating to depreciation 30.1 Under the existing provisions of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation is allowed for 8 assessment years. 30.2 With a view to enable the industry to conserve sufficient funds to replace plant and machinery, specially in an era where obsolescence takes place so often, the Act has dispensed with the restriction of 8 years for carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation. The Act has also clarified that in computing the profits and gains of business or profession for any previous year, deduction of depreciation under section 32 shall be mandatory. 30.3 Under the existing provisions, no deduction for depreciation is allowed on any motor car manufactured outside India unless it is used (i) in the business of running it on hire for tourists, or (ii) outside in the assessee's business or profession in another country. 30.4 The Act has allowed depreciation allowance on all imported motor cars acquired on or after 1st April, 2001. 30.5 These amendments will take effect from the 1st April, 2002, and will, accordingly, apply in relation to ....