2016 (8) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Advocate For Respondent: Shri S.N. Gohil, A.R. ORDER Heard both the sides. 2.  These two miscellaneous applications are filed by the Applicant; one seeking condonation of delay of 688 days in filing the ROM application and the second one for rectification of mistake in the order dt.12.09.2013.  The learned Advocate Shri S. Suriyanarayanan vehemently arguing on merit submitted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed. 3.  Per contra, the learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that both theses applications are not maintainable, inasmuch as the ROM application has been filed after six months from the date of order of the Tribunal.  Therefore, as per the provisions of Section 35C(2) of CEA,1944 the present ROM application is not maintainable.  It is his further contention t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcise or the other party to the appeal: Provided that an amendment which has the effect of enhancing an assessment or reducing a refund or otherwise increasing the liability of the other party, shall not be made under this sub-section, unless the Appellate Tribunal has given notice to him of its intention to do so and has allowed him a reasonable opportunity of being heard." 5.  O....