2014 (12) TMI 1252

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A' (hereinafter referred to as ITAT) dated 31.07.2006 in ITA No. 2618/Ahd/2004 for the Assessment Year 2000-01, the revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal. 2. This appeal was admitted on 10.12.2007 for consideration of the following substantial question of law: ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er for the purpose of deduction u/s. 80HHC. The CIT(A) decided the said issue in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal confirmed the findings of the CIT(A) and therefore the revenue is in appeal challenging the said finding. 3.1 This question of law raised for consideration in the present Tax Appeal is now not res integra in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Incom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....new flooring at old gasket shed Rs. 1,30,500/- (ii) Replacement of fencing of pillars and wires by new masonry wall Rs. 5,00,900/- Total Rs. 6,31,400/- 4.1 The Assessing Officer had disallowed the expenditure as being on replacement, it gave a new and different advantage of enduring nature. The CIT(A) allowed the same with the observation that these were the items already present....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... capital expenditure. The CIT(A) has proceeded on the footing that the company had erected fencing wall long back with barbed wires with cement poles and was capitalized and that after a long period it was necessary to repair the same by re-erection using old major materials liked barbed wires etc. The CIT(A) observed that in the process the company spent on repairing without bringing out any new ....