TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (8) TMI 262
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld CIT(A) has erred in:- (i) deleting the addition of Rs. 50,29,106/- on account of unexplained cash at Bank and cash in hand U/s 68 of the Act; (ii) deleting the addition of Rs. 72,000/- on account of undisclosed rental income." Ground of Assessee's C.O. No. 35/JP/2014 "1. That the ld CIT(A) while allowing GOA 3 of the appellant erred in ignoring appellants' submission that he has disclosed rental income what he actually received which has necessitated him more payment of tax on undisclosed income Rs. 8,71,000/- which could have been otherwise less by Rs. 21,600/- being 30% of Rs. 72,000/-." 2. The assessee filed his return for the A.Y. 2005-06 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at he had concealed the income which has not been disclosed. Accordingly, the ld Assessing Officer made addition of Rs. 17,79,612/-. The ld Assessing Officer further observed that the assessee had not shown rent from L-113, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi Flat at Rs. 1,32,000/- for which no rent agreement had been produced and rent was received in cash. In absence of any written rent agreement, the mere explanation of the assessee cannot be accepted. It has to be something more, accordingly, he proposed rental income at Rs. 17000/- per month. The assessee had also given the reply and claimed that the assessee would have got standard deduction @ 30%, if he would have shown higher rental income, which was in his own benefit. The assessee's argument wa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....me in respect of cash deposited in the bank. The only contention being these balances were getting carried over from the cash book/bank account balances for the previous years. After considering the assessee's reply, the ld Assessing Officer held that the cash deposited in the bank accounts are undisclosed income of the assessee. The assessee claimed that the amounts deposited in the bank were out of house rent, bank interest and other related undisclosed sources not found acceptable to the ld Assessing Officer. There was no satisfactory explanation before the ld Assessing Officer of the assessee. In absence of any documentary evidence, he treated Rs. 50,29,106/- as undisclosed income of the assessee. 3. Being aggrieved by the order of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court decision in the case of CIT Vs Parmeshwar Bohra (2007) 208 CTR 218 (Raj). Accordingly, he allowed the appeal. Similarly, he also deleted the addition made under the head rental income by holding that if the rental income is increased then undisclosed income decreases by Rs. 72,000/- being telescopic impact thereby could have saved tax on Rs. 21,600/- being a standard deduction @ 30%. 4. Now the revenue is in appeal and the assessee is in C.O. before us. The revenue is against deleting the addition and the assessee in C.O. against the observation made by the ld CIT(A) on undisclosed income under the head rental income. The ld DR has vehemently supported the order of the ld Assessing Officer and further argued....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....04) Rs. 2000551/- (iv) SB A/c in name of brother (bal as on 01/4/04) Rs. 32700/- (v) SB A/c in name of Self (bal. as on 01/4/04) Rs. 3317791/- Rs. 7745872/- He further submitted that the assessee had rental income of Rs. 62,000/- per month and no cash in hand had been shown in the opening balance. The assessee had shown income for A.Y. 2005-06 at Rs. 70,79,612/-. All bank entries are routed through cash book, which is cross verified by the ld Assessing Officer, if there was insufficient fund for bank deposit, it is taken as undisclosed income. Total of such income during the A.Y. 2004- 05 was Rs. 8,71,000/-. After claiming standard deduction, additional income of Rs. 15,44,610/- was d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bank accounts for the year under consideration to calculate the maximum income generated by the assessee during the year under consideration. The ld Assessing Officer had made addition on the basis of closing balance, the assessee also not submitted the details of credit and debit entries of all the bank accounts for the year under consideration, therefore, the assessee was also not came with clean hands after evading tax from F.Y. 1997-98 by acquiring Kirti Nagar, New Delhi flat. Thereafter Bal Mandir house, Kota in A.Y. 2001-02. The assessee disclosed shortage of cash as income at Rs. 8,71,000/- but it is not clear where this amount has gone, which is statutory obligation on the part of the assessee to disclose the true and full particula....