Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....opadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the respondent ORDER Per Shri H. K. Thakur This appeal has been filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No.33/KOL-VI/2012 dated-07/12/2012 passed by the Commr. (Appeals), Kolkata-III) as first appellate authority. 2. Shri N.K. Chaudhury, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that refund claim of Rs. 1,46,444/- has been rejected by the f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... should be treated as November, 2009 when the refund claim was filed. (i) Commr. of C. Ex. Raipur-Vs.-Simplex Engg. & Foundary WorksPvt. Ltd. -2016 (333) ELT 112 (Tri.-Del) (ii) Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd.  Vs. Commr. of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI-2015 (315) ELT 100 (Tri.- Kolkata) (iii) Commr. of Cus., ICD,TKD, New Delhi Vs. Marvel Polymers Pvt. Ltd. -2013 (294) ELT 272(Tri.-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as taken a view that relevant date of filing the refund claim should be taken as 25/8/2010 when refund claim was filed after rectification. The Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant relied upon the case law of this Bench in the case of Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI- 2015 (315) ELT 100 (Tri.-Kolkata). After going through the provisions of Section 11B of the C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respects, when filed on 12th June, 2003, hence that should be taken as the filing date. In rejecting the refund claim as time-barred, both the authorities below had observed that the date on which refund claim was filed only after removal of defects, be considered as the date of filing of the refund claim. We do not find force in the observation/reasoning of the Department, inasmuch as the refund....