Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (8) TMI 163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of the Income Tax Appellant Tribunal raising following questions for our consideration: "[A] Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in confirming the ld. CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,65,96,000/- made by the AO on account of Transfer Pri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EZ Limited owned by the assessee-company. It was noticed that this guarantee was provided for charging any guarantee fees. The assessee was, therefore, put to notice why arm's length guarantee fees should not be computed in relation to this transaction. In response to the notice, the assessee contended that the assessee-company deed intend to provide a guarantee by pledging its shares. However....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....refore, have reference to some other transaction. 4. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Commissioner. The appellate Commissioner reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer observing that IDBI Trusteeship Ltd is security trustee of ICICI Bank Limited, Singapore and thus, RBI's letter refusing permission for pledge of the shares refers to the same transaction. Since the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of an AE, however, such transaction did not go through since the RBI permission, which was needed, was not granted. The TPO ventured in the realm of conjectures when he recorded that despite this refusal, the assessee may have gone through with the pledging of shares, but there is nothing on the record to suggest that despite refusal from RBI, assessee pledged the shares. The CIT (Appeals) as well....