Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 951

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and Ms. Premlata Bansal JUDGMENT In this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution, orders passed by the authorities under the IT Act, 1961 (in short the 'Act') are assailed. 2. A reference to the factual aspects in some detail would be necessary. Petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [in short CIT(A)] relating to the asst. yr. 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Mills Ltd. (1992) 101 CTR (SC) 91: (1992) 193 ITR 255(SC) : TC 29R.727. CIT(A) did not accept the plea of the assessee-petitioner on the ground that Arvind Mills Ltd.'s case (supra) related to development rebate and not to the claim of depreciation. It appears to us that CIT(A) did not take note of certain observations made by the apex Court in Arvind Mills Ltd.'s case (supra), more part....