2016 (7) TMI 1033

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....k Yadav, Advocate with Shri Udit Jain, Advocate - for the appellant Shri Amresh Jain, D.R. for the respondent ORDER Rectification of mistake applications have been filed seeking rectification of CESTAT Order No. 53549-53551/2015 dated 13.8.2015 on the ground that the said order is at variance with the order pronounced in the open Court, inasmuch as, as per the pronouncement in the open Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oresaid CESTAT order is not at variance with the order pronounced in the open Court and that there is no error apparent pointed out by the appellant in the CESTAT order per se and therefore it is no case for rectification of mistake. 3.  We have considered the contentions of both sides and perused the record.  We find that the order sheet dated 13.8.2015  states as under : "St....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... demand of service tax, interest and penalties in relation to foreign exchange also the order in original dated 29.11.2013 has been set aside and case remanded for de novo adjudication.  In its appeals, the appellant prayed as under : "In the circumstances it is most respectfully prayed that the Honble Tribunal may be pleased to: (a) set aside/quash the impugned Order No. 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... demand, interest and penalties also got set aside) and passed 'further' order (for de novo adjudication only in relation to service tax demand, interest and penalty relating to "foreign exchange").  Thus even the order sheet noting dated 13.8.2015 reproduced earlier is not in disharmony with the CESTAT order dated 13.8.2015.  Incidentally Supreme Court in its judgement dated 2.5.2008 in....