Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (7) TMI 1029

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t Rules, 2004. In March, 2014, the officers of Central Excise conducted stock verification of raw materials and finished goods in the premises of the appellant. Upon such verification, the officers arrived at a shortage of 79.573 MTs of H.B. Wires (raw materials), 23.069 MTs of H.B. Wires (finished goods) short. Proceedings were initiated against the appellant for recovery of duty of Rs. 4,73,759/- on the ground that the said goods have been cleared without payment of duty. The Original Authority confirmed the demand and imposed equal amount of penalty. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order upheld the demand and penalty. 2. Against this order, the appellant is in appeal. 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the appellant. The whole demand is based on the alleged shortage of raw materials based on the rough estimation. In absence of any evidence of illicit manufacture, unaccounted clearance, transport, etc., no duty demand can be sustained.  (e) Reliance was placed on various decided cases to reiterate that mere shortage of raw materials alone cannot sustain the charge of clandestine removal. 4. Ld. AR supported the findings of the lower authorities. He stated that stock taking was done in the presence of two witnesses and the Director of the appellant. No objection was taken by the appellant at that time. Having agreed to the shortage, it is for the appellant to explain such shortage. The demand of duty towards such materials fou....