Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (7) TMI 983

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of `On-Money' amounting to Rs. 1,52,53,128/-" 2. We heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. Manish R Bhatt assisted by learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt for the appellant. 3. The relevant facts emerging from the record of the appeal are that the assessee partnership firm, engaged in the business of real estate, developed the project namely 'Amarjyot Apartment' and 'Amardham' during the financial years 1997-98 to 2003-04. For the year under consideration being assessment year 2005-06, the assessee showed the sale of 39 flats for the total price of Rs. 2,18,11,872/-. Net profit of Rs. 16,79,144/- was shown and deduction under section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinaft....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the ground that in assessee's own case in ITA No.2041 for the previous Assessment Year 2004-05, it had held that in absence of any cogent evidence, no extrapolation could be made. 4. The following observations in the impugned order reflect the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal while dismissing the Department's appeal. "After hearing both the sides, we have carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. It is pertinent to note that in para 10, the ITAT, Ahmedabad 'D' Bench in assessee's own case in ITA No.2041/A/2007 for the assessment year 2004- 05, has held that in the absence of any cogent evidence, there was no scope for extrapolation. On this basis, it was held that addition cannot be made in other years. ....