1990 (12) TMI 321

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....later on re-designated as Deputy Collector. The petitioner was appointed as Additional District Magistrate on January 21, 1963. A new service called "Tripura Civil Service" was constituted with effect from March 4, 1967. The petitioner was not found suitable for induction in the Tripura Civil Service at the time of its initial Constitution due to adverse remarks in his confidential reports. The petitioner challenged his on-selection to the Tripura Civil Service by a writ petition before the Judicial commissioner, Tripura. The writ petition was finally heard on February 2, 1970 when the State of Tripura agreed to consider the petitioner for appointment to the Tripura Civil Service after reviewing the adverse remarks in the characte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the Indian Administrative Service because he was not selected to the Tripura Civil Service when it was initially constituted on March 4, 1967. 4. Mr. Tapash Ray, learned Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the adverse remark having been expunged from the character rolls, of the petitioner and having been appointed to the Tripura Civil Service with effect from March 4, 1967 the petitioner, vas entitled to be considered for appointment to the Indian Administrative Service with retrospective effect. 5. .The contention in the abstract is unexceptionable but in the facts of this case we are not inclined to interfere. The petitioner filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, being Civil Rule No. 23 of 1974, before ....