2015 (3) TMI 1202
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 01.08.2013 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-14, Mumbai for the quantum of assessment u/s 143(3), on the following grounds: "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made by the AO of Rs. 14,81 ,34,192/- incurred by the assessee on project development expenditure ignoring t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 2. At the outset, learned counsel submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has followed the earlier order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) for the A.Y. 2008-09, which has been confirmed by the Tribunal vide order dated 27.11.2013. Even in the grounds, the revenue has stated that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for A.Y. 2008-09 has not been accepted by the department and matter is sub judice before the ITAT. Hence the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....revenue expenditure. From the breakup of the details of the expenditure, it is seen that following expenses have been debited: Details of revenue expenditure debited to CWIP Amount (Rs.) Salaries & Wages 56,384,211 Contribution to Provident Fund, 3,515,643 superannuation Fund Gratuity, Leave Encashment Others 5,524,445 Rent 12,222,525 Travelling ....
TaxTMI