Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (7) TMI 224

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llants received and stored imported as well as indigenous  LPG  in bulk and thereafter sent it to various LPG bottling plants in the State of Karnataka, Kerala, Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh and Goa for bottling and also for supply of LPG through retail dealers.  The appellants import LPG and also enter into an agreement with all other oil companies like Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., IBP Co. Ltd  for sale/purchase of LPG. 2.1  During the period 1.4.2002 to 31.3.2004, the appellant imported LPG and filed 120 bills of entry which were assessed provisionally pending submission of original documents from the supplier.  In terms of the agreement/contract agreed  between t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....value of the imported LPG by including the demurrage charges of Rs. 1,66,58,227/- paid to the supplier on account of detention of the vessel beyond the 'lay time' into the assessable value of the imported LPG by invoking the provisions of Rule 9(2)(a) of the Customs Valuation Rules 1988 and to include the differential canalising charges into the assessable value by invoking the provisions of Rule 9 (1)(a)(1) of the Customs Valuation Rules 1988 and proposed to demand the differential duty.  2.2.  Appellant contested the allegations in the show-cause notice and filed a reply stating that the demurrage charges were not includible in the assessable value,  that demand of interest was not sustainable since the amendment to Sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been referred to Larger Bench. We find that the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Shine Petroleum Pvt. Ltd. and MGM International Exports Ltd. have correctly considered the issue and in view of that, we hold that for the period from 2-3-2001 to 26-9-2006, the ship demurrage charges cannot be included for the discharge of customs duty on the imported goods even if the assessments are made provisionally." He also cited a decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Indian Oil Corporation & Other Vs CC [2002(122)ELT 615] wherein the larger bench held that ship demurrage charges paid for detention of the ship beyond the lay time was not to be considered as transport cost as it was not ordinarily paid and therefore set....