Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 1055

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....minated wrapper. The appellant in their own factory produce the printed wrappers by printing a plain BOPP film and then laminating it with plain polyester film. Some of these printed laminated wrappers are consumed by the appellants captively and some produce is cleared to the contract manufacturing units of the appellant on payment of excise duty. The appellants were availing cenvat credit on the excise duty paid in respect of the inputs for printed laminated sheets. The Revenue was of the view that since the printing and laminating of a plain Polyester film does  not amount to manufacture, no excise duty was payable on the printed wrappers cleared by the appellant to their contract manufacturing units. Therefore, in the light of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....prises - 2013 (288) ELT 247 (Tri.) which has been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court reported in 2013 (294) ELT 203 (Bom.) 4.  On the other hand, learned AR reiterated the findings in the impugned order. 5.  Heard both sides and considered the submissions. 6.  Short issue before us is that whether the activity of printing/laminating of BOPP films which were used as laminated wrapper for packing of biscuits by the appellant shall amount to manufacture or not? Similar issue came up before the apex court in the case of Fitrite Packers (supra) wherein this Tribunal has held as under : - (i)      Whether the goods in question, i.e., printed GI paper are classifiable under Chapter Heading ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iscussed above falls into four neat categories. (1)     Where the goods remain exactly the same even after a particular process, there is obviously no manufacture involved. Processes which remove foreign matter from goods complete in themselves and/or processes which clean goods that are complete in themselves fall within this category. (2)     Where the goods remain essentially the same after the particular process, again there can be no manufacture. This is for the reason that the original article continues as such despite the said process and the changes brought about by the said process. (3)     Where the goods are transformed into something different....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t of the said particular company/customer. The printing, therefore, is not merely a value addition but has now been transformed from general wrapping paper to special wrapping paper. In that sense, end use has positively been changed as a result of printing process undertaken by the assessee. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the process of aforesaid particular kind of printing has resulted into a product, i.e., paper with distinct character and use of its own which it did not bear earlier. Thus, the 'test of no commercial user without further process' would be applied as explained in paragraph 20 of Servo-Med Industries (supra). The aforesaid paragraph is extracted hereunder. "20. In Brakes India Ltd. v. Superintendent o....