Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../2009-10, passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 254 & 250(6) / 143(3) r.w.s 250(6) of the Act. 2. The assessee has raised several grounds in its appeals, however, the cruxes of the issues are as follows:- ITA No.10/Mds/2016 (Assessment Year : 2002-03): i) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the order of the learned Assessing Officer who had disallowed the professional and consultancy fees paid for Rs. 6,83,000/- to PWC towards "equity expansion" by holding it to be capital in nature. ii) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the order of the learned Assessing Officer who had disallowed 0.5% of the average investments towards expenditure attributable for earning ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad disallowed 0.5% of the average investments towards expenditure attributable for earning exempt divided income by invoking section 14A r.w.r 8D. 3. Brief facts are that the assessee is engaged in the business of long term housing finance, filed its returns of income for the relevant assessment years. Subsequently, assessments were completed by the learned Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Act wherein certain additions were made and the same was confirmed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), aggrieved by which the assessee is in appeal before us. ITA No.10/Mds/2016 : (Assessment Year: 2002-03): Ground No.1: Disallowance of professional and consultancy fees paid for Rs. 6,83,000/- to PWC towards "equity ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation of an information memorandum, identification of potential investors, assistance in value analysis, assistance in structuring the consideration and the transaction, assistance in negotiations and coordinating the completion of the transaction. 4.2 The learned Departmental Representative on the other hand, argued in support of the Revenue and further stated that the nature of consultancy service rendered by the consultants were for the expansion of the equity capital base of the assessee company. 4.3 We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the materials available on record. The nature of service rendered by M/s. PWC to the assessee company such as preparation of information memorandum, identification of potential....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer is in accordance with the provisions of the Act, we do not find it necessary to interfere with the orders of the Revenue. Accordingly, this ground is also held against the assessee. ITA No.11/Mds/2016 (Assessment Year : 2004-05): Interest earned on ICD, FD & IT Refund as 'income from other sources': 6. The assessee had derived interest income as follows:- i) Interest on ICD Rs.6,34,019 ii) Interest on FD with banks Rs.58,568 iii) Discounting charges Rs.31,71,471 iv) IT Refund Rs.25,355   Total Rs.38,89,413   6.1 The assessee had also claimed deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Act on the income earned by its business of providing long term housing finance.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ITA No.1048 & 787/Mds/2000 dated 29.02.2008 confirmed the order of the learned Assessing Officer. 6.3 The learned Authorized Representative could not controvert these facts. Since the Tribunal has already decided the issue in the assessee's own case inconformity with the order of the learned Assessing Officer, who had meticulously analyzed the issue and by relying in the various decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court held the matter against the assessee, we do not find it necessary to interfere with the orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on this issue. Thus, this matter is also decided against the assessee. ITA No.12/Mds/2016 (Assessment Year : 2006-07): Ground No.1 : Disallowance of depreciation: 7. The le....