Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as revoked in this order. Security deposit of Rs. 75,000/- furnished by the appellant was also ordered to be forfeited. The appellant has also filed separate appeal against the suspension of the licence which was done earlier on 27.8.2012. Both the appeals have been heard analogously and are being decided by this order. 2. Commissioner of Customs, ICD, TKD, New Delhi noticed serious irregularities on the part of the appellant in connection with filing Bill of Entry No.856627 dated 14.12.2009 and an action was initiated against the importer as well the appellant for improper import. Commissioner of Customs, ICD informed the Commissioner of Customs (General) vide his order dated 5.7.2012 recommending action to be taken against the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed records. 6. Under the CHALR, 2004 Regulation 20 empowers the Commissioner to suspend or revoke the licence and the procedure which needs to be followed in this regard is found in Regulation 22. For ready reference Regulation 22 is reproduced as under: "22. Procedure for suspending or revoking licence under Regulation 20-  (1) The Commissioner of Customs shall issue a notice in writing to the Customs House Agent within ninety days from the date of receipt of offence report, stating the grounds on which it is proposed to suspend or revoke the licence and requiring the said Customs House Agent to submit within thirty days to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs nominated by him, a written stateme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not relevant or material, he shall record his reasons in writing for so doing.  (5) At the conclusion of the inquiry, the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs shall prepare a report of the inquiry recording his findings and submit his report within ninety days from the date of issue of a notice under sub-regulation (1).  (6) The Commissioner of Customs shall furnish to the Customs House Agent a copy of the report of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, and shall require the Customs House Agent to submit, within the specified period not being less than thirty days, any representation that he may wish to make against the findings of the Deputy Commissioner of C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t in the regulation, the same will have to be inferred from the circumstances of the case. From the records we find that the licensing authority namely the Commissioner of Customs (Import & General) has been apprised of the matter by the Commissioner of Customs , ICD through Order-in-original dated 5.7.2012. This may be practically considered as the offence report. The show cause notice proposing revocation has been issued on 30.1.2014, well beyond the ninety days limit prescribed for the same in regulation 22(1). The inquiry report which is mandated to be completed within ninety days from the date of the show cause notice has been filed only on 27.2.2015, very much beyond the ninety days time limit prescribed for the same. Finally the impu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er CHALR 2004/CBLR 2013 in Saro International Freight Systems vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai reported in 2015 - TIOL - 2916 - HC - MAD - CUS. The Hon'ble High Court in para 28 of the above judgment has held: "28. . It is pertinent to mention here that the CBLR, 2013 have replaced the CHA Regulations. The CHA regulations did not have any time limit to complete the proceedings. Therefore, by a Circular 09/2010 dated 8.4.2010, the necessary to include a time limit for initiating action was addressed by the Board after filed inspection and by an notification dated 8.4.2010, amendments prescribing time period for initiating action and completing proceedings was made. The same was given effect by notification dated 20.1.2014. Whereas , un....