Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... INCOME TAX) JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan} This appeal, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for brevity), is preferred against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad (Tribunal), in I.T.A.No.1717/Hyd/2014 dated 27.03.2015. The appellants herein filed the appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT (Appeals), ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsequently, the assessing Officer levied a penalty of Rs. 22,81,879/- under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act by his order dated 26.03.2009. Aggrieved thereby, an appeal was preferred. The assessee contended before the CIT (Appeals) that the assessee had neither concealed any income nor furnished inaccurate particulars of income for the year under consideration and that levy of penalty, under Section 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come, the impugned additional had been made; this was evident from the Statement of Taxable income, a copy of which was submitted; from the statement, it was clear that the assessee had disclosed all the facts, relating to the earning of income from property, in the return of income filed by them; no particulars of income from house property were suppressed; the addition of Rs. 52,85,744/- had bee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the Act can be entertained only if a substantial question of law arises for consideration. It is only if the appellants are able to satisfy the Court that the finding recorded by the Tribunal is based on no evidence or the finding is perverse, can a substantial question of law be said to arise necessitating interference in appeal under Section 260A of the Act. In the present case, the Tribunal h....