Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd considered the material available on record. 3. On ground Nos. 1 and 2, the assessee challenged the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in not admitting the additional evidence under rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 and confirming the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 4. Briefly the facts of the case are that search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act was conducted on October 8, 2010, in the Chauhan group of cases. The assessee filed return of income under section 139 of the Income-tax Act on October 10, 2008, showing a total income of Rs. 14,43,163. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under section ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the additional documents were absolutely necessary for adjudication of the case and that the same were not available with him at the time of completion of the assessment which was, therefore, sufficient cause for non-production before the Assessing Officer. The additional evidences sought to be admitted in respect of both the creditors were their copies of permanent account number card, bank account statement and confirmatory letters. 5(i) The learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) noted that the assessee attended the proceedings before Assessing Officer and original return was filed in October, 2008, and return under section 153A was filed in September, 2012, therefore, the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee to place the same on record. Therefore, the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from producing these vital and necessary documents before the Assessing Officer, therefore, additional evidences should have been admitted by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). He has submitted that since loans have been taken through banking channel, therefore, no addition should be made against the assessee. 6(i) On the other hand, the learned Departmental representative relied upon the orders of the Assessing Officer and submitted that the assessee failed to comply with rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, therefore, additional evidences were correctly rejected by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). He has submitted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and necessary for the purpose of adjudicating the issue and goes to the root of the matter. The Assessing Officer also asked the assessee to produce these evidences at the assessment stage in order to discharge the burden upon the assessee under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tek Ram v. CIT [2013] 357 ITR 133 (SC) ; [2013] 262 CTR (SC) 118 held that, "Additional evidences admitted as relevant and required to be looked into by the authorities below". The same view is taken by the hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Mukta Metal Works [2011] 336 ITR 555 (P&H). 8(i) Since additional evidences are relevant and goes to the root of the matter, therefore, the learned Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lakhs on account of unexplained credit in the light of the additional evidences admitted above, with direction to the assessee to produce copies of these additional evidences before the Assessing Officer for final determination of the issue on the merits. The Assessing Officer shall give reasonable sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 11. In the result, ground No. 1 of appeal of the assessee is allowed and ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 12. On ground No. 3, the assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 5,50,000 on account of agricultural income. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee has shown the agricultural income of Rs. 58,384 under section 139 of the Ac....