Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner under the provisions of section 146(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that there was a business connection of the assessee in India on account of the functioning of its Indian branches in India? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that on a proper reading of the article 2(1) of the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation between of India and Japan, the activities, of India branch of the non-resident assessee-company resulted in bringing about existence of a permanent establishment of the assessee in India and thereby making liable to tax in India income att....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... day of October, 1984." 3. Learned counsel for the assessee has drawn our attention to a decision rendered by this Court in CIT v. Smt. Asha M. Primlani [IT Reference No. 532 of 1986, dated 6-9-2007 to contend that it has already been held that the Commissioner of Income-tax could exercise powers under section 263 of the Act in respect of an order passed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner but only with effect from 1-10-1984. In other words, the amendment to section 263 was with prospective effect from 1-10-1984, the date mentioned in section 47 of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984. "(a) In sub-section (1), the following explanation shall be inserted at the end, namely :- 'Explanation.-For she removal of doub....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and decided in such appeal." 7. The subsequent amendment in 1989 has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Shri Arbuda Mills Ltd. [1998] 231 ITR 501 . This has been reiterated in CIT v. Shree Manjunathesware Packing Products & Camphor Works [1998] 231 ITR 532 (SC), a decision cited by learned counsel for the revenue. 8. Thus within the same provision, that is, the Explanation to section 263, two different types of languages are used. The words "shall he deemed always to have extended to such matters" occurring in clause (c) is absent in clause (a). It was the presence of those words in clause (c) that persuaded the Supreme Court in Shri Arbuda Mills Ltd.'s case (supra) to hold that clause (c), which was introduced by the 198....