Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (5) TMI 798

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in C.No.407/11/2002-03 dated 13.02.2004 and quash the impugned order and consequently direct the respondent to grant relief to the petitioner for the assessment year 2000-01. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that it is a Partnership Firm consisting of four partners, engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of tiles and de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that once the income is offered, then the same cannot be withdrawn. 3. Mr.R.Senniappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not voluntarily admit an income of Rs. 25,00,000/- at the time of survey and that the statement was given only on the threat made by the respondent. The petition filed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act was dismissed on the g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R 367 (SC) in the case of CIT vs. Shelly Products, wherein it has been held that the Act enjoins upon the assessee the duty to file a return of income disclosing his true income and the filing of the return and payment of tax thereon amounts to an admission of tax liability which the assessee admits to have incurred in accordance with the Act. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submi....