Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (5) TMI 785

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Rakesh Sinha, Advocate And Shri Pradeep Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate ORDER PER R.K. SINGH: Appeal is filed against order in original dated 16.1.2009 in terms of which service tax demand of Rs. 3,83,53,072/-, education cess of Rs. 7,67,062/- and secondary and higher education cess of Rs. 3,83,531/- was confirmed along....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by M/s Bhilai Steel Plant to the sub contractors as per the order of Hon'ble High Court and that no interest is recoverable from the appellant in such a situation because it (appellant) did not receive the amount from SAIL and the interest is chargeable with reference to the date of receipt of the payments. The appellant stressed on the meaning of word "receive" to stress that it did not receive....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....It was for this reason that the sub-contractors did not ask the appellant to make payments for services rendered (as per sub-contracts between them and the appellant) for which they directly got payments from SAIL and the appellant also did not ask SAIL to pay it for the services rendered as per its contracts with SAIL for which SAIL directly paid to the sub-contractors. We have seen a representa....