2014 (2) TMI 1254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....when the prayer for interim relief was refused. However, the petitioner was permitted to deposit the dues within three months from the date of the said order and till such period the respondents were restrained from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner. 2. The matter was subsequently taken up on 3rd April, 2013 when a confusion was sought to be created by the petitioner relating to the words "dues" and "demand". 3. According to the petitioner whether the liability subsequent to the period, which is the subject matter of the said writ petition, may come under the purview of "dues" or it is restricted to the adjudicated amounts as assessed by the Assessing Authority. 4. The Court did not find any justification fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nding. The Tribunal was not sitting regularly and, therefore, the application could not be taken up. Taking advantage of such situation, the department intended to initiate a recovery proceedings. In the backdrop of above, the Division Bench held that the department cannot take advantage on their own wrong. 8. This Court does not find that the ratio laid down in the said judgment rendered by the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court can at all be applicable in the present case. 9. The writ petition challenging the original order has been filed by the petitioner before this Court with a prayer for an interim order. The Court consciously recorded that no case is made out for issuance of any interim protection at the stage of admi....