Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  u/s. 11  of  the Income Tax Act merely on the ground that the registration u/s.12AA has been granted  with  effect  from  1.4.1990,  without noticing that no charitable activities have been conducted and the income from the letting out of Kalyana Mandapam assessable under the head business has not been applied for any charitable purposes like education or any other object of general public utility?" 2. The assessee is a Society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act.  The relevant assessment years  are  1994-95,  1 995-96, 1996-97,  1997-98 and 1998-1999 respectively.  Admittedly, the Society was allotted a land by the Collector of Salem District in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....997-98, since the assessee itself admitted  the income  for  the  assessment  year  1998-99  and 1999-2000, as income from the business, which  was  also  accepted  under  Section  143(1)(a)  of  the  Act.  Therefore,  the  assessing officer issued notice under Section 148 of the Act. However, the assessee filed nil returns for all the years on 30.3.2001. 4. According to the  assessee  Society,  it  is  a  registered  one established  for  charitable purpose and its income was exempted under Section 11/12 of the Act.  But, the revenue rejected the explanation of  the  assessee on  t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ratio laid down in  ADDL. CIT  v. SURAT  ART  SILK  CLOTH MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION [1980] (121 ITR 1) wherein it is held that it is sufficient to take  into consideration  the  dominant  and  primary  object  of the Trust to decide its character whether it is for charitable purpose or  not,  allowed  the  appeals preferred  by the assessee and granted exemption under Sections 11 and 12AA of the Act, which was confirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,  on  appeal at the instance of the revenue.  Hence, the above appeals. 6. The  learned  Standing Counsel appearing for the revenue, placing strong reliance on the  decisio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t out maintenance, repairs and renovation expenses.  It is not in dispute that the assessee used  to  let out  Kalyana  Mandapam for social and charitable activities collecting nominal rent.  Based on these undisputed facts,  the  Commissioner  and  the  Tribunal rendered  a  concurrent  finding  that  the  very activity of constructing the Kalyana Mandapam and letting out to  the  local  people,  mainly  weavers  and agriculturists,  satisfied the charitable object, even though the assessee had not diverted the accumulated fund for any other charitable purpose, viz.   for the  upliftment  of  the&....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner or Commissioner to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the Trust or Institution and to grant registration, by exercising  such  power conferred under  Section  12AA  of  the Act.  The above fact cannot be lightly disregarded under the facts and circumstances of the  case,  inasmuch  as  the same has got persuasive effect to the case of the assessee. 11. Therefore,  in  view  of  the  above  concurrent  finding  of the Commissioner that the construction of Kalyana Mandapam and letting out  itself is a charitable activity, the decision rendered by this Court in CIT v.  HALAI NEMON ASSOCIATION [2000] (243 ITR 439) has no app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the ratio laid down in ADDL.  CIT v. SURAT ART SILK CLOTH MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION [1980] (121 ITR 1), the  assessee  satisfies  the  dominant  and  primary object  of  the  Trust  by  putting  up  construction  and letting the same by collecting nominal rent, which would not defeat the right of  exemption  under Section  11  of  the  Act,  merely on account of the fact that the accumulated funds had not been spent for other charitable activities, viz.  for upliftment of the poor, education and other social activities, which was wrongly  weighed by  the  assessing  officer  that  the Trust had ....