Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (11) TMI 583

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts unit at Kandla Special Economic Zone (for short "SEZ"), has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and prayed that the impugned orders dated 1.7.2003 (Annexure : A) and 9/10.6.2003 (Annexure : B) passed by the respondent No.2 be quashed and set aside. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of writ of mandamus or direction, issuing direction to the respondent to grant Duty Entitlement Pass-Book (for short "DEPB Entitlement") as per its Application for the period from 5.6.2002 to 31.3.2002 as per Export and Import Policy 2002-2007, vide Notification dated 5.6.2002. 3. The Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industries, issued Notification No.1/2002-07 dated 31.3.2002 in exercise of power....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for supplies from the DTA. We are concerned with Clause : 7.9 (a) in this petition. Therefore, the same is reproduced hereunder : (a) Supplies from the DTA to SEZ units shall be eligible for the following : (I) DTA supplier shall be entitled fro :- (i) Relevant entitlements under Paragraph 8.3 of the Policy (ii) Discharge of Export performance, if any, on the supplier. Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, issued notification No.7/2002-07 dated 5.6.2002 in exercise of powers conferred u/s.5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) read with Paragraph : 1.1 of the Export and Import Policy, 2002-07, adding sub-clause (iii) to Paragraph 7.9 (I) of Chapter VII of the Polic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment to the Office of the Development Commissioner, Kandla Special Economic Zone vide their Application dated 26.5.2003. Non-granting of DEPB resulted in very high procurement cost for basis raw material and as a consequence thereof their export competitiveness was affected. It was also stated in it that despite clear provisions of the EXIM policy the said benefit is not provided to them, therefore, necessary instruction be issued to the competent Authority to consider their case sympathetically and extend the benefit of DEPB to the supplies from DTA which was procured by them during financial year. 5. The Development Commissioner, Kandla, SEZ, by its letter dated 1.7.2003 informed the petitioner that though the provisions in the Exim Poli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 5.6.2002 and by not denying the benefit under it the petitioner has made to suffer tremendous loss. He, therefore, submitted that the impugned orders/letters dated 1.7.2003 and 9/10.6.2003 (Annexure : A & B respectively) passed by the Development Commissioner and Joint Development Commissioner respectively be quashed and set aside. In support of his submission Shri Thakore has placed reliance on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/S. MOTILAL PADAMPAT SUGAR MILLS CO.LTD. v/s. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS., reported in AIR 1979 SC 621 and the Judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of UNION OF INDIA v/s. YOKOGAWA BLUESTAR LTD.m, reported in 2001 (129) E.L.T. 598 (Kar.). 7. We have already narrated th....