Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (5) TMI 378

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 16/6/2005 to 31/5/2007, under the category of "Site Formation and Clearance, Excavation and Earth Moving and Demolition Services". In addition, interests stand confirmed and penalties stand imposed under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. 2. As per facts on record, the appellant entered into contract with Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) for providing rig drilling services, for extraction of oil, on an already prepared surface. The said drilling rig services was to be provided by specialized and efficient drilling rigs equipped with latest technology and equipment alongwith highly qualified and experienced crew. When the mining services were introduced in the Service Tax net w.e.f. 01/6/2007, the appellant registered ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egislation w.e.f. 01/6/2007. Its stand further clarified in the said letter that prior to this date, such activities, being part of mining operation itself are not subject to service tax. Learned Advocate draws our attention to the Tribunal decision in the case of Atwood Oceanics Pacific Ltd. vs. CST, Ahmedabad reported as 2013 (32) S.T.R. 756 (Tri. - Ahmd.), wherein identical services were held to be falling under mining services. As such, submits the learned Advocate that by no stretch of imagination, the services being provided by the appellant can be held to be services other than "mining services". He also submits that once the Revenue accepts the activity of the appellant as falling under mining services, w.e.f. 01/6/2007, it has to b....