2014 (12) TMI 1231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. The respondent No. 2 is an Advocate. He submitted an application under Section 6 of the RTI Act on 26-7-2010 to the Central Public Information Officer, SP/CBI, Port Blair which was transferred to CPIO/CBI/ACB/Kolkata Port Blair Branch. The information sought by him is as follows :- (a)     Photocopy of the Case Diary and the supplementary case diaries in connection with the case No. RC 7 of 2008. (b)     Photocopy of the visitors Register of SP, ACB, CBI, Kolkata for the dates i.e. 18 to 20 February, 2008 and 7 to 9 April, 2008. (c)     Photocopy of GD Register of SP, ACB, CBI, Kolkata office for the period of 18 to 20 February, 2008 and 8 to 10 April, 2008. (d)&nb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 27-9-2010 with respect to points (a) to (g). The concerned Central Public Information Officer was directed to provide the information in respect of the points (h) and (i). This information was denied by claiming exemption under Section 8(1)(j) of the Act. Being aggrieved by that order, respondent No. 2 preferred an appeal on 21-10-2010 to the Second Appellate Authority. 4. The Central Information Commission who is the 2nd Appellate Authority passed an order on 13-7-2011 after hearing the parties. The appeal filed by the respondent No. 2 was allowed and the Central Bureau of Investigation was directed to provide the information sought by the respondent No. 2. 5. Aggrieved by that decision the Central Bureau of Investigation has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dings and also would invade the privacy of the officers concerned. 8. The CIC on considering the submissions made before it has allowed the appeal directing the Public Information Officer, Central Bureau of Investigation, Port Blair to supply the information with regard to points (a), (c) and (e) after severing the names and other particulars of persons, the disclosure of which would endanger their life or physical safety or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes. The information requested under points (b), (h) and (i) has also been directed to be supplied. 9. In my view, the CIC has passed a well reasoned order. There is no reason why there should be any opp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e on the basis of a doubt would certainly cast a shadow on his integrity and consequently his career. Mr. Tabraiz did not insist on the information sought under query (h). However, the information sought under query (i) can certainly be supplied to the respondent No. 2 as rightly held by the CIC. 12. The CIC, in fact, has taken care in not directing disclosure of all material in respect of points (a), (c) and (e) and has directed that such information should be supplied after severing the names and other particulars of the persons, the disclosure of which would endanger their life or physical safety or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes. 13. With respect ....