Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y  a  labour  contractor  and  not  an  industrial  undertaking eligible for the benefit of Section 80 HH and 80 I of the Act. 4. Aggrieved  by  the  assessment  order, the assessee filed appeals before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who held  that  there  is  no need  for  the  assessee  to be a manufacturer in his own right and even a job worker, or a person who uses the customer's raw  material  would  qualify  for being  termed  as an industrial undertaking, supported by the decision of this Court in C. Kadarkarai v.  CWT [1989] 176 ITR 121.  The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), by order dated February 2, 1993, regarding the assessing officer's view that the assessee was a unit created by the splitting up of the business of Sri Kaleeswari Fire Works, held that there is nothing on record to indicate such a presumption. 5. Aggrieved  by  the  order  dated  February 2, 1993  of  the Commissioner of Income-tax  (Appeals),  the  Revenue  took  out  further  ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tle the assessee to claim the benefit of Section 80HH and 80-I, as the asseesee  by  itself  has produced the new product, viz., crackers, out of the raw materials furnished by Sri Kaleeswari Fire Works and thus,  satisfies  the ingredients  of  the  terms  "manufacture"  and  "industrial undertaking", for having engaged 200 labourers. 10.  In the light of the above rival contentions and in order to decide the questions raised, we are obliged to render a finding on the following points : (i) Whether the assessee is a manufacturer; (ii) Whether   the assessee satisfies the ingredients of an industrial undertaking to claim the benefit of Sections 80 HH and 80-I; (iii) Whether the assessee loses the character of manufacturer merely because it has engaged coolies under a labour contract to produce the end product, viz., crackers and for having obtained raw materials from Sri Kaleeswari Fire Works, who pays the duty; and finally (iv) Whether the payment of duty by Sri Kaleeswari Fire Works will disentitle the assessee to claim the benefit of Sections 80HH and 80-I of the Act. 11. Before proceeding further, it is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rs next following the 31st day of March, 1981, or  such  further  period  as  the  Central  Government  may,  by notification in the Official Gazette, specify with reference to any particular industrial undertaking; (iv)  in  a  case  where  the  industrial  undertaking manufactures or produces articles or things, the undertaking employes ten or more workers in a manufacturing process carried on with the aid of power, or employes twenty  or more workers in the manufacturing process carried on without the aid of power : Provided that the condition in clause (i) shall not apply in respect of any  industrial  undertaking  which  is  formed  as  a   result   of   the re-establishment, reconstruction or revival by the assessee of the business of any  such  industrial  undertaking  as  is referred to in section 33B, in the circumstances and within the period specified in that section: Provided further that the condition in clause (iii) shall, in relation to a small-scale industrial undertaking, apply as if the wo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; ascertain  whether  an  activity  amounts  to  manufacture  or production  of  an  article  or  thing  have  been laid down and reiterated by various decisions of the apex  court  and  this  High  Court.    Broadly, the requirement is that the raw material must be, in the first instance, subjected to a process of such a nature that it cannot be termed to be the same as the end-product after the raw material undergoes the process of manufacture.    In other words, the goods purchased as raw material should go in as inputs in the process of manufacture and the result must be manufacture of other goods.  The article produced must be regarded by the trade as a new and distinct article having an identity of it sown, an independent market after the commodity is subjected to the process of manufacture.  The nature and extent of the process would vary from case to case, and in a given case, there may be only one stage of  processing,  while  in  another  case,  there  may  be  several  stages of processi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s would   amount  to  manufacture. Whether  in  a  particular  case manufacture has resulted by process or not  would  depend  on  the  facts  and circumstances of the particular case. 30.  A  Constitution  Bench  of  this  Court in Ujagar Prints and Anr.  v. Union of India ; AIR 1989 SC 516 ; [1989] 179 ITR 317___ followed the earlier decision  in Empire Industries Ltd. v.  Union of India (supra).  While following the earlier judgment it was held that if there should come into  existence  a  new article  with  distinct  character  and  use  as  a result of the process, the essential condition justifying manufacture of good is satisfied. 31.  This Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax, v. Jagannath Cotton Co. [1995] 5 SCC 527 ; [995] 99 STC 83_____mentioned that manufacture in its ordinary connotation, signifies  emergence  of  new  and  different  goods  as understood in relevant commercial circles." (emphasis supplied) 15. Applying the above ratio, we do not have any hesita....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp; given liberal interpretation.  In CIT v.  N.C. Budharaja and Co. [1993] 204 ITR 412, the Apex Court has held that while  deciding  on the  entitlement  of  the  benefit under Section 80HH and 80-I, which being a beneficient object, a liberal interpretation,  of  course  without  doing  any violation  to  the  plain  language,  is  to  be given and thus, held that the assessee was an industrial  undertaking  eligible  to  claim  the  benefit  of Sections 80 HH and 80-I of the Act. 18.  In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the assessee has only  been  supplied with the raw materials from Sri Kaleeswari Fire Works and of course, he has engaged coolies, viz., 200  labourers  to  produce  the  end product  of  crackers, thus satisfies the test of manufacturer by producing the new material, namely, crackers and  also  satisfies  the  test  of  industrial undertaking, as the assessee has involved in systematic activity, organised by co-operation  between&n....