Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (6) TMI 1022

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mas Mathew Nellimoottil, SC JUDGMENT ANTONY DOMINIC, J. Heard the counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. In this appeal, stay order dated 23.3.2015 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Bangalore in S.T.26506/13 is challenged. The appellant society was issued a demand for service tax of about ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....which the Tribunal has again directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 crore and report the compliance on 4.6.2015. It is in this background impugning the order dated 23.3.2015, this appeal is filed. 4. From the judgment of this Court in C.E.8/13, what we find is that the order dated 19.8.2013 was interfered with, primarily for the reason that there was no finding on the issue of limitation raised ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the normal period. This, therefore, mean that the issue of limitation, though not considered by the Tribunal, cannot have any relevance in so far as this 35 crores is concerned. 6. The appeal is of 2013 and this is second round of litigation before this Court and if we direct reconsideration, that will only delay the final disposal of the appeal again. 7. In such circumstances, instead of remitt....