Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e relates to the asst.year 2005-06. The assessee is a partnership firm. Though there are 7 grounds of appeal, the only issue relates to the computation of the assessee's income under the head "Income from house property'. The brief facts in this connection are that the assessee owned a property by name "The Summit" from which rent of ₹ 18,39,027/- was declared and in d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent which the property may be reasonably expected to let from year to year would be an amount against which the maintenance charges have to be reckoned with. In support of the claim the assessee has also filed copies of the bills issued by the apartment owners' Association and clarified that Mr. Avinash Amarlal in whose name the bills were issued was the previous owner of the property from who....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....these orders were also filed. The learned DR strongly relied on the orders of the departmental authorities. 3. On a careful consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the issue stands squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the aforesaid orders of the Tribunal. In the Delhi case (supra), it was held that the amount of service charges were not deductible u/s. 24 but would be deduct....