Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 958

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 880 of 2009 Tax Case (Appeal) No. 1097 of 2009 - -<br>Income Tax<br>K. RAVIRAJA PANDIAN and M. M. SUNDRESH JJ. T. Ravikumar, for the Appellant J. Balachandar,&nbsp;&nbsp; K. Ravi,&nbsp;&nbsp; N. Muthukumar for&nbsp;&nbsp; Dr. Anitha Sumanth, for the Respondents JUDGMENT K.Raviraja Pandian,J.- These tax case appeals are filed at the instance of the Revenue formulating the following ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) has been rendered by this Court on 10th Sept., 2007, whereas the Bombay High Court judgment has been rendered on 7th May, 2009 [The Bombay High Court judgment is CIT vs. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. &nbsp;(2009) 223 CTR (Bom)]. Whatever may be the reasoning given by the Bombay High Court, this Court has followed the decision of the Supreme Court in Surana Steels (P) Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT (1999) 237 ITR 777(SC)....