Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Kumar Rastogi, Adv. and Mr. Parijat Saurav, Adv For the Respondent : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. SC, IT, Mr. Alok Kumar and Ms. Shalini Bihari JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue. The assessee-appellant, being a Public Sector Undertaking of the Government of Bihar, had filed a return of income declaring total income of Rs. 51,23,7....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with respect to the balance amount of Rs. 7,04,053/-, the dues of the other months, the Tribunal agreed with the orders of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) holding that the said delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESI and EPF aggregating to Rs. 7,04,053/- has rightly been treated as income of the assessee under Section 2(24(x) of the Act. Accordingly, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....03.2007 in the case of CIT Vs. Vinay Cements Limited which reiterated the earlier decision of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd: (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). In Alom Extrusions case (supra) the Apex Court in the relevant part of para-16, has held as follows:- "16. We find no merit in these civil appeals filed by the Department for the following reas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was sought to be given in respect of tax, duty, cess or fee by explicitly stating that if such tax, duty, cess or fee is paid before the date of filing of the return under the Income-tax Act ( due date), the assessee(s) then would be entitled to deduction. However, this relaxation/incentive was restricted only to tax, duty, cess and fee. It did not apply to contributions to labour welfare funds. T....