Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (3) TMI 1072

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d travels and provides Hajj and Umrah services to the pilgrims. The business activities of the assessee company includes Air ticket booking, visa stamping for Hajj pilgrims, earning of profit from foreign exchange etc. The relevant assessment year in the present appeal is 2009-10. A search under section 132 of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the assessee company on 10.11.2010. Subsequently notices under section 153A were issued to the assessee for six years i.e. A.Y. 2005-06 to 2010-11. During the course of search at the premises of the assessee company, a computer belonging to the assessee was seized in which collections from Hajj and Umrah services was recorded as Rs. 118,27,12,252/-. The assessing officer observed that the assessee had not accounted for a total amount of Rs. 94,96,37,990/-. It is further revealed from the assessment record that the assessee company had maintained three accounts with Federal Bank, Calicut in which total deposits amounting to Rs. 94,96,37,990/- was made between 20.04.2007 to 29.03.2011. The details of the deposits in the three accounts of Federal Bank are extracted herein below:- Sl.No. F.Y. A/c.No.5501 A/c.No.4967 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the assessee company was estimated at Rs. 32,000/-. Accordingly, addition of Rs. 1,92,00,000/-was made with respect to 600 pilgrims. 7. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 30.03.2013, the assessee company preferred appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) in its order dated 30.06.2014 observed that the income of the four Hajj Group firms floated by the assessee company deserves to be added to the total income of the assessee company on substantive basis while maintaining the protective assessments in the hands of the four firms as the evidence suggests that it was only the assessee company which had been managing the affairs of providing Hajj and Umrah Services to the pilgrims through its network. 8. Before the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee submitted detailed analysis of the three bank accounts maintained by it in Federal Bank Calicut. Accordingly, the Ld.CIT(A) referred the same to the assessing officer for a remand report. The assessing officer reiterated his observations given in the assessment order. After considering the details submitted by the assessee, the Ld.CIT(A) held that the bank accounts in the name of the assessee in Federal bank cannot be treated as undisclo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ccounted in the preparation of final accounts. 12. The Ld. AR at the outset admits that the income of the four Hajj firms may be taken as the income of the assessee company on a substantive basis. The Ld. AR rebutting the submissions made by the Id. DR argues that the receipts as well as the withdrawals appearing in the aforesaid bank accounts have been entered and accounted for in the books of account of the assessee company and all the transactions carried out have been recorded in the books. He submits that the receipts collected by the four firms were deposited in the three accounts mentioned as the firms did not have bank accounts in their own name. The Ld. AR has referred to the letter dated 14.03.2013 by the Managing Director of the asseessee company wherein it was stated that the credits in the bank accounts were reflected in the books of accounts of the assessee company and further withdrawals from the bank accounts were reflected in the cash book maintained. He further submits that the detailed analysis of these three bank accounts had been produced before the ld. CIT(A) wherein the source of deposits in the bank accounts was explained along with complete details of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atement of cash flow. The ld.CIT(A) has verified the details of the bank accounts and found no infirmity in the details given by the assessee company. The objection of the revenue that the reliance should solely be placed on the statement of Sh. M. Narayana Kumar is misplaced. The assessing officer went on a wrong premise and added the entire deposits appearing in the bank accounts without deducting the withdrawals made. It is a settled principle of law that only the real income of the assessee has to be taxed and not notional income. In any case, the assessee could not have been subjected to tax only on the deposits in the bank accounts. 17. As far as the details furnished by the assessee company before the ld.CIT(A) is concerned for which remand report was requested from the assessing officer, no adverse objections had been raised by the assessing officer. The ld.CIT(A) has observed that the source of the receipts in the bank accounts are verifiable. We, therefore, find no infirmity in the order passed by the CIT(A) with respect to the aforesaid addition. The addition pertaining to the deposits made in Federal Bank was rightly deleted by the ld.CIT(A). 18. In result thereof....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espect of 600 pilgrims the income is estimated @ Rs. 1,35,39,595/- on the basis of profit estimated from one person @ Rs. 22,565/- for 600 pilgrims. The amount of income estimated @ Rs. 1,35,39,595/- is highly excessive considering the income earned by the other hajj groups. For the above reasons and other arguments those may be put forward at the time of hearing the appellant may submit that the assessment of Rs. 35,46,000/- in respect of income from Kerala Islam Hajj and Umraj Services, Calicut and the income estimate @ Rs. 1,35,39,595/- may be." 25. The ground no.1 & 2 raised by the assessee area already adjudicated by us in the appeal filed by Revenue in ITA No.449/C/2014 wherein, we have held that substantive assessment in respect of four firms floated by the assessee, viz. Kerala Islam Hajj and Umrah Service, Ahlan Hajj and Umrah Services, Salamat Hajj Group and Vazco Hajj Group, is to be made in the hands of the present assessee only. In view, therefore, the issue is remanded to the file of the AO to determine the substantive income of the assessee afresh in accordance with the assessment of four firms stated hereinabove, at the rates determined therein. Thus, gr....