Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt is that certain amounts were admittedly due to be paid by the appellant-company to the respondent-company for which an agreement was entered into between the two companies on February 24, 2012, whereby the appellant-company had acknowledged its liability to pay the outstanding amounts in instalments spread over several months between March and October, 2012. The appellant contested the matter by denying its liability to pay the said dues, on the ground that the same were disputed dues and it also raised an objection that since the respondent-company was carrying on business in India with an established place of business in India and having failed to comply with the provisions of sections 592 to 594 of the Companies Act, it would be prohi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... having any office, warehouse, store house, etc., within the territory of India or any of its employees are permanently posted in India. The documents on which learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon only goes to show that the respondent-company provides technical service in India by providing spare parts and other technical assistance which would not mean that they have any establishment or office in India but provide such services on demand, as and when required by staff or engineers going to India temporarily for providing such services. As such, we are not satisfied with the objection of the appellant that in such circumstances the respondent-company would be obligated to comply with sections 592 to 594 of the Companies Act, 1....