Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (11) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent: Shri Rana Pratap Singh Dass ORDER Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member . - This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A), Ludhiana dated 17-9-2004 for the block period from 1-4-1990 to 16-1-2001 on the following grounds :- "(1)The ld. CIT(A) has erred both in law and on facts of the case in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee's clai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case of B.D.A. Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [1998] 65 ITD 501 deleted the addition and allowed the claim of the assessee for set off of the losses against the undisclosed income. Similarly, the Assessing Officer charged surcharge under section 113 of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(A) deleted the charging of surcharge by following various decisions of the different Benches of the ITAT and was of the view tha....