2016 (3) TMI 862

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT's Rules, they are descriptive and argumentative in nature. In brief, the grievance of the assessee is that the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the penalty of Rs. 2,14,152/- which was imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in manufacturing and trading of Rolls etc. Machinery Parts. It has filed its return of income on 28.12.2006 declaring total income at Rs. 2,53,076/-. An assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) on 04.12.2007 determining the total income at Rs. 2,76,980/-. On perusal of the assessment records, the learned Commissioner has harboured a belief that the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oice value of Rs. 9,33,500/- for the purpose of excise duty. The Excise Authorities have worked out such invoice value at Rs. 15,69,724/-. This invoice value has been arrived at on the basis of certain noting made by the employees. The acceptance at the end of the assessee for payment of excise duty would not automatically authorize the Assessing Officer to visit the assessee with the penalty. The Assessing Officer in the original assessment proceedings verified the books of accounts of the assessee and did not make any addition. In the set aside assessment order, the Assessing Officer has simply relied upon the information collected from Excise Authorities, but did not examine the material collected by the Excise Authority himself. Thus, a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rs of such income or fringe benefits: Explanation 1.- Where in respect of any facts material to the computation of the total income of any person under this Act, (A) Such person fails to offer an explanation or offers an explanation which is found by the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner(Appeals) or the CIT to be false, or (B) such person offers an explanation which he is not able to substantiate and fails to prove that such explanation is bona fide and that all the facts relating to the same and material to the computation of his total income have been disclosed by him, then, the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income of such person as a result thereof shall, for the purposes of Clause (c) o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otal income under the provisions of the Act, the assessee is not able to substantiate the explanation and the assessee fails to prove that such explanation is bona fide and that the assessee had disclosed all the facts relating to the same and material to the computation of the total income. Under first situation, the deeming fiction would come to play if the assessee failed to give any explanation with respect to any fact material to the computation of total income or by action of the Assessing Officer or the Learned CIT(Appeals) by giving a categorical finding to the effect that explanation given by the assessee is false. In the second situation, the deeming fiction would come to play by the failure of the assessee to substantiate his exp....