2007 (9) TMI 76

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....), dated 19-2-07. 2. Heard both sides on the stay petition. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows : (a) The applicant received certain capital goods during the period Feb.' 04 to March' 04 and took credit amounting to Rs. 1,58,427/-representing 50% total eligible credit in March, 2004. (b) They filed I.T. Return for the financial year 2003-04 i.e. Assessment year 2004-05 clai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rity dis-allowed the entire credit amounting to Rs. 3,16,856/- wrongly taken on the capital goods on the ground that they have also claimed income-tax benefit by way of depreciation which has been upheld by Commissioner (Appeals). 4. The learned Authorized Representative submits that it was a mistake in claiming depreciation after taking the Cenvat credit on the capital goods; but it was not a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner and submits that the appellant having taken the credit in the financial year ending March '04 and after filing income-tax return claiming depreciation cannot be treated as mere omission or a mistake; but for the detection by Audit, the appellant would have availed both the benefits, which is not permitted. 6. I have carefully considered the submissions from both sides. It is admitted by t....