Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (9) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation when the wilful suppression of certain expenses incurred by the assessee while declaring the assessable value with intent to evade central excise duty ? (3)   Whether CESTAT has erred in setting aside the demand as time barred, by not justifying the amendment made in Section 11A vide Section 110 of Finance Act, 2000 ? 3. By consent of both the parties, the appeal is taken up for final hearing. 4. The relevant facts are that since 1989 the respondent (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') is engaged in the manufacture of biscuits which are liable to central excise duty under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 5. The assessee manufactured biscuits for and on behalf of M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd. ('BIL' fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). By an order dated 28-7-2000 the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) held that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the extended period of limitation was not applicable and, therefore, the show cause notice was invalid. However, in view of section 110 of the Finance Act, 2000, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) held that the impugned show cause notice got validated. Challenging the said order, the assessee filed an appeal before the CESTAT and by the impugned order, the CESTAT set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) inter alia on the ground that the Validation Act does not confer unfettered powers to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have been, for all purposes, validly and effectively issued or served under that section, notwithstanding any approval acceptance or assessment relating to the rate of duty on or value of, the excisable goods by any Central Excise Officer under any other provision of the Central Excise Act or the rules made thereunder. (2) Any action taken or anything done or purporting to have been taken or done under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act at any time during the said period shall be deemed to be and to have always been, for all purposes, as validly and effectively taken or done as if sub-section (1) had been in force at all material times and, accordingly, notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree of any court, tribunal....